Carepatron · growth analytics · 13 July 2026

New setup dashboard: first-week results

The redesigned setup dashboard moves more new users through setup on their first day. Completions rose about a third across every comparable step. The cost is a 41% fall in recommended-card clicks. It is too early to read conversion.

Version 3 released the evening of Monday 6 July 2026 · straight deploy, no feature flag, no holdout · data from PostHog production to 13 July

Completed 2 or more setup steps on day one
38.5%
â–² +9.6 pts vs 28.9% before
significant, z = 3.6
Completed 3 or more setup steps on day one
20.3%
â–² +5.9 pts vs 14.4% before
significant, z = 2.9
Clicked a recommended card on day one
13.9%
▼ −9.6 pts vs 23.5% before
significant, z = 3.9
Clicked connect Stripe on day one
10.1%
â–² +5.4 pts vs 4.7% before
significant, z = 4.4

Weekday signups only. Before: 16 June to 3 July, 1,212 people. After: 7 to 10 July, 296 people. Each person is measured for the 24 hours after their own signup.

More users complete setup on day one

The share of new users finishing zero comparable steps fell from 51% to 43%, and the gain lands in the 2-step and 3-step buckets. The 4 comparable steps are locations, services, client import and online payments. We excluded the team step from this count because its old tracking logged skips as completions.

Before release (16 June to 3 July) After release (7 to 10 July)
Steps completed within 24 hours of signup, share of each cohort. Direct labels show the after-release series; hover or use the table for every value.
View the data
Steps completedBeforeAfter
0 steps51.2%42.6%
1 step19.9%18.9%
2 steps14.5%18.2%
3 steps12.0%17.9%
4 steps2.4%2.4%

Every comparable step improved

Locations gained the most, up 9.9 points. Payments barely moved on completion, but payment intent doubled (see the behaviour table below) and Stripe onboarding never finishes on day one. The team step is excluded from this chart: its tracking changed twice in this window, so its numbers are not comparable. Its reconciliation is in the next card.

Before After
Share of each cohort completing the step within 24 hours of signup. The team step is excluded because its measurement changed twice in this window; the next card reconciles it.
View the data
StepBeforeAfterChange
Add locations36.0%45.9%+9.9
Add services28.6%35.8%+7.2
Import clients25.4%31.8%+6.4
Online payments4.4%5.1%+0.7

Team invites did not fall: two measurement changes stacked

The team step's drop from 14.2% to 8.4% is fully explained by 2 tracking artefacts, and the behaviour underneath is flat.

  • The old checklist inflated the baseline. Its 14.2% decomposes into 7.8% of signups who really created a staff member within 24 hours plus 7.0% who clicked 'remind me later', which the old design logged as a completion.
  • A separate team-invite revamp on 2 July changed what 'create staff' means. Global staff-creation events ran 30 to 45 per weekday through June, then collapsed to single digits on exactly 2 July, the day the new invitation events first fired. Inviting a teammate now sends an invitation; the staff record mostly arrives when the invitee accepts. This happened 4 days before the dashboard release.
  • Comparing cohorts with identical invite mechanics (2 to 3 July signups on the old dashboard against 7 to 10 July on the new), 5.1% versus 6.1% took a real team action (created a staff member or sent an invitation) within 24 hours. Adding copied invite links, 5.1% versus 8.8%. Both reads are flat to slightly up, within noise at these sample sizes. One caveat: the 2 to 3 July cohort is the invite revamp's own launch days, so if that flow had early instability the old-dashboard baseline is understated.

The defensible claim is 'no evidence of a material decline in invite initiation', not 'team invites are fine': the samples are small and invite acceptance is not yet validated. Going forward, measure a 'team growth action' (union of 'create staff', 'Team member invitations sent' and 'Invite link copied', per workspace) and label it exactly that, because a copied link is weaker intent than a sent invitation. Treat 2 July as a definition break: report the before and after series separately, never as one trend. Judge team activation (invites accepted) on 7 and 14 day windows, since acceptance depends on another person. Anything downstream that counts 'create staff' (activation analyses, segmentations, staff-count segments) will read team growth as roughly halved from 2 July unless it adds the invitation events.

Skipping is new, and people use it. One in 5 day-one signups now skips at least one step, which resolves the checklist instead of leaving it to nag. Counting completions and skips together, 33.8% of new users deal with 3 or more of the 5 steps on day one, against 17.7% before.

Share of after-release signups (n = 313) who skipped each step within 24 hours. Client import and payments are the most-skipped steps, which matches who signs up: solo practitioners with nothing to import and no card setup planned.
View the data
StepSkipped within 24 hours
Import clients15.3%
Online payments13.7%
Add locations6.7%
Add services5.8%
Invite team5.4%

Attention moved from the cards to the checklist

The inline step panel absorbs the first session. That helps setup and payments intent, and it costs the recommended cards. Nothing downstream broke: creating a client is trending up, and notes and booking-link shares are within noise.

Day-one behaviourBeforeAfterChangeRead
Clicked a recommended card23.5%13.9%−9.6 ptssignificant fall (z = 3.9)
Clicked connect Stripe4.7%10.1%+5.4 ptssignificant rise (z = 4.4)
Created a client25.0%29.7%+4.7 ptsborderline rise (z = 1.9)
Created a note18.0%15.5%−2.5 ptswithin noise
Shared their booking link8.9%9.8%+0.9 ptswithin noise

Watch the cards. The AI Scribe card was the top discovery path for AI notes, and note creation is drifting down inside the noise band. If 7-day AI-notes adoption dips this week, raise the cards or hand off into features when the checklist completes.

Too early to call conversion

Fast subscriptions look lower after the release: 0.6% of the release week's signups subscribed within 72 hours, against a June average around 2.4%. We do not read this as a design effect yet, for three reasons.

Share of each signup week subscribing within 72 hours of signup, all days, strictly censored. The 29 June peak is promo-assisted: 9 of its 21 fast subscribers used $1 or July 4 promo codes. No promo code ran after the release.
View the data
Signup weekSignupsSubscribed in 72 hRate
1 June480122.50%
8 June51730.58%
15 June489112.25%
22 June583162.74%
29 June495214.24%
6 July (release)32920.61%
  • Promo codes inflated the before period. The strongest week (29 June, 4.24%) had 9 of 21 fast subscribers on $1 or July 4 codes, and 22 June had 5 of 16 on codes. Nothing comparable ran after the release.
  • The metric is volatile. The week of 8 June hit 0.58% under the old design with no release in sight, essentially the same as the release week.
  • The numbers are tiny. Two subscribers in the release week cannot separate signal from noise, and exposure to the upgrade path is unchanged (about 14% of day-one signups open the upgrade modal, against 15% before).

The honest conversion read arrives in two parts: 7-day Stripe connections mature from 14 July, and the first 14-day subscription windows complete on 20 July. The April analysis found people who complete 3 or more steps subscribe at about 4 times the rate of those who complete none, but that was correlation. This release is the test of whether pushing more people past that line moves revenue.

Tracking changes and caveats

2 July
Team-invite revamp shipped (invitations, invite links, permission presets), separate from the dashboard. It moved most staff creation from invite time to acceptance time, so 'create staff' volume roughly halved from this date for mechanical reasons.
6 July
Version 3 live for new signups and existing accounts with unfinished setup. New skip event per step. Step completions are now real user actions in both periods; we verified timing against account creation.
12 July
Richer tracking shipped: checklist item clicks, import source choices, and the connect Stripe button tagged to the dashboard.
13 July
The 'learn the basics' and 'chat with our team' tiles started tracking (7 and one clicks on day one). The 'book a product expert call' tile still emits no event; every recorded book-a-call click comes from the global header button.
  • The old 'get started' PostHog dashboard (904713) now over-reads. Feature completions rose about 5 times after the release for mechanical reasons: branding and calendar moved from checklist steps into the card set.
  • Any metric that counts the team step as a completion shows a false decline. The old design logged 'remind me later' as a completion; the new design logs it as a skip.
  • There is no holdout. The release was a full deploy, so every comparison here is before-and-after, not a controlled test. The regional mix of signups was stable across the release (72% to 77% Americas in both periods), so mix shift is not driving the results.

What to watch this week